Mid Mountains Legal Blog

Shinohara bids ‘Sayonara’ to addbacks

Anthony Steel

Previously, when determining a Family Law property application, Courts were permitted to ‘add back’ on a notional basis assets contributed by either party that had dissipated by the time of the property settlement.

However, the 2025 decision in Shinohara & Shinohara (No 2) by the Full Court of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia has made it clear that, following amendments introduced under the Family Law Amendment Act 2024 (the 2024 amendments), addbacks are out.

Grounds for the appeal

This appeal dealt with parenting and property matters after a six year marriage. A significant issue at trial was the inclusion of “addbacks,” particularly regarding the wife’s contributions (pre-marital funds and an inheritance) which were no longer part of the asset pool. The Trial Judge did not consider these addbacks.

The three Judges of the Full Court found that the Trial Judge had failed to ensure procedural fairness and consequently they re – exercised the discretion. The appeal was heard following amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 (the Act) brought about by the 2024 amendments, so the Full Court used the revised framework.

The decision

Section 79(3)(a)(i) of the Act now expressly limits the pool of divisible property to that which presently exists. The Appeal Court held that “…only…existing property is to be divided or adjusted.”

However, although such contributions would now be considered under those parts of the Act that deal with historical contributions (s79(4)) and current and future circumstances (s 79(5)), they can still influence property division. Their Honours said: “the categories …pre-amendment that were notionally added back are to be considered in ensuring a just and equitable outcome, either by way of historical contributions, or by way of their relationship to and impact upon the current and future circumstances at the s 79(5) stage.”

What does it mean?

Add-backs are out! The Shinohara decision confirms the end of notional addbacks.

Even partial property and legal fees, which were standard add backs, are now a thing of the past.  

Past financial contributions must now be considered through the statutory framework for historical contributions and future needs, rather than by making adjustments to the asset pool.

Legal strategies must now be amended. Family lawyers often sought the early release of funds to assist parties in meeting day-to-day expenses and legal fees, on the basis that these would form part of their final property settlement. As a consequence of this decision, any early release of funds is just money spent and will not be considered as part of the final property pool. So careful consideration is now required before requesting or agreeing to an early release of funds.

Here to help

Contact us now for free no-obligation telephone advice about family law property settlements.

You might like...

Related Article

CGT Rollover Relief in Family Law Property settlements

Related Article

How is an Inheritance treated in a Family Law Property Settlement?

Related Article

How do I Split my Super as part of a Family Law Property Settlement?